"GE and Berkshire Hathaway have nearly equal shareholder equity levels, approximately $80 billion each, as of the end of 2003. But while Berkshire showed a profit of $8 billion for 2003, GE's profit for the same period was a whopping $15.5 billion, nearly double Berkshire's. During the past seven years, aGE has produced an average ROE of 23.9%, dwarfing Berkshire's 5.4%. In addition, GE pays a dividend of between 40% and 50% of the company's profits. Payment of a dividend has the effect of slowing GE's increase in book value, yet GE's book value per share has still grown nearly 20% faster than Berkshire's over the past seven year.
It surely seems GE is a better managed company than Berkshire.
GE gets a high return on equity because they are absolutely swimming in debt. Anybody can increase their return on equity by taking on more debt than they have market cap(as GE has done). However, the part about dividends makes a good point. If Buffett isn't producing with the equity that he's reinvesting, he should distribute it to us as a dividend. He has said he would do so when the time came that he could no longer get a higher return than Berkshires individual shareholders could. Unless he has something really big up his sleeve, I think that time has come.
What company in the US has been better managed than GE ?
Buffet has done very well by his shareholders. Maybe not the best, but very well.