Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three Dozen New Galaxies Are Found in Nearby Space
NY Times ^ | December 22, 2004 | DENNIS OVERBYE

Posted on 12/24/2004 6:07:04 PM PST by neverdem

Fourteen billion years after the Big Bang started it all, there is still life in the old cosmos.

Astronomers announced yesterday that they had discovered three dozen baby galaxies in what passes for nearby space in the universe - two billion to four billion light-years distant. The galaxies, which are blossoming with new stars at a prodigious rate, resemble the infant Milky Way 10 billion years ago, the astronomers said.

Studying these new galaxies could give cosmologists new insights into the processes by which galaxies and stars first formed out of clouds of primordial gas and dust at the beginning of time.

"It's like looking out your window and seeing a dinosaur walk by," said Dr. Tim Heckman of Johns Hopkins University, who led a team using a NASA satellite, the Galaxy Evolution Explorer, or Galex, to pinpoint the newborns. Dr. Heckman spoke in Pasadena, Calif., at a news conference at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which manages the satellite. A paper describing the results has been submitted to The Astrophysical Journal.

The babies were a pleasant surprise.

Like the parents of a woman of a certain age who long ago gave up hope of grandchildren, astronomers had given up hope that the universe was still producing galaxies that could grow up to be the size of the Milky Way. The heyday of making stars, the active ingredients of galaxies, was five billion to eight billion years ago. Perhaps only dwarf galaxies were being born today.

"We didn't know if there were any newborns still around or if this phase of cosmic creation is over," Dr. Heckman explained.

The baby galaxies appear as bluish blobs of light about 10,000 light-years across in images sent back by the Galex satellite, which was launched in 2003 on a 29-month mission to survey the sky for ultraviolet emissions.

Ultraviolet light, which has a shorter wavelength than visible light, is produced by the hottest, most massive stars, like those of the Pleiades cluster, which shines in the sky above Orion these frigid crystalline nights. Because such stars do not last very long, they are also among the youngest stars in the sky.

As a result, young galaxies stand out in ultraviolet light, said Dr. Chris Martin of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the principal investigator for the Galex project. "Ultraviolet traces star formation," Dr. Martin said.

The hitch for astronomers hoping to study the recent evolution of stars and galaxies is that the atmosphere blocks ultraviolet rays from reaching Earth. So ultraviolet astronomy can be pursued only in space, with instruments like the Hubble Space Telescope and Galex.

Galex is designed to spot the ultraviolet glows of young stars and galaxies and thus help fill in the history of star formation and cosmic evolution over the last 10 billion years. It has a specially designed 20-inch-diameter telescope with a field of view four times as big as a full moon.

The new babies are only the first results of the project, and the astronomers said they expected to find more, although not many.

While they are not nearly the size of mature galaxies like the Milky Way, which is about 100,000 light-years across and has about 200 billion stars, the newborn galaxies outshine them in ultraviolet by a factor of 100 or so, which means they are producing stars "at a prodigious rate," in the words of Dr. Martin.

Dr. Alice Shapley, a theorist at the University of California, described them as "stragglers" of the great wave of galaxy formation that peaked when the universe was half its present age.

It is important, Dr. Shapley said, to try to find out what is finally causing these galaxies to form now. Are they accreting fresh star material from outside, for example? Indeed, she said, astronomers still do not know for sure whether these are really new galaxies, or whether perhaps they are old galaxies, hiding old stars inside them, that are undergoing a new burst of star formation.

These would be ideal objects to study with the Hubble Space Telescope, she added.

What will happen to these newborns is another mystery, Dr. Heckman said.

The infant Milky Way coalesced out of the murk 10 billion years ago, when the universe was more crowded and baby galaxies could bang into one another, merge and grow. "It's less clear what will happen in the future," Dr Heckman said.

The universe is now a more diffuse place, and the baby galaxies may have been born into loneliness. If so, they will never grow up.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Technical; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: galex; nasa; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 last
To: xp38
I might be wrong but I have read that the great galaxy in Andromeda can be visible to the naked eye under ideal conditions. Ditto for another in Triangulum although it is much fainter.

Indeed. But the question was for stars. Any individual star is ver close on a cosmic scale. Heck, the Andromeda galaxy is close by cosmic standards.

141 posted on 12/25/2004 10:41:56 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: winodog
A single sun larger then the orbit of jupiter? I have never heard of that but I LUV it.

Here is a chart on the stellar sequence. :-)

http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~soper/Stars/hrdiagram.html

142 posted on 12/25/2004 10:44:44 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: xp38
Yes, you can see M31 with the naked eye. I have seen it myself this way when I lived in the desert. From my backyard in the big city, I can find it with binoculars.

A few people have claimed to observe galaxy M33 (Triangulum) unaided. It's close enough to us that its angle of size in the sky is greater than that of the moon, but it's surface brightness is very low. I have never been able to find M33 with binoculars.

About 4 people say they have observed galaxy M81 unaided, which is 12 million light years distant. If this is true, the conditions would have to be extraordinary, and there are probably only a handful of people on Earth who's vision is that sharp.

143 posted on 12/25/2004 11:12:39 PM PST by Spandau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Ok....but are you not at least technically observing stars when one views M31? Also what about the Magellanic clouds? I have always thought of them as satellites of our own Milky Way Galaxy but around the time of the 1987 Super Nova I read they were considered separate from the Milky Way.

M31 for your pleasure


144 posted on 12/25/2004 11:15:40 PM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
Is GOD cool or WHAT ?

He is MAJOR cool. UNbelievable.
All we can do is sit back and admire in awe and wonder.
His Son's birthday is all the more wonder to celebrate His coming to us...mere "us."

145 posted on 12/26/2004 7:04:40 AM PST by starfish923
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Baraonda

"I alway wondered why they call it the Milky Way."

Seriously? OK, but some more sensitive souls might want to look away.

A goddess was breast-feeding her child, pulled the child away from her breast and the milk shot out and made the stars.

Think about that next time you treat someone to a candy bar.


146 posted on 12/26/2004 7:33:31 AM PST by johnmilken (happy new year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: xp38
the great galaxy in Andromeda can be visible to the naked eye under ideal conditions

I first saw M31 when I was a teen. I have been watching it ever since, mostly in amazement that it is still visible even when stars dimmer than mag 4 are lost in the light pollution.

147 posted on 12/26/2004 12:02:34 PM PST by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Spandau
M81 unaided, which is 12 million light years distant.

Which means you're looking at 12 million year old data. It might be obsolete. But then - what would that mean?

148 posted on 12/26/2004 1:39:05 PM PST by sevry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888

Norway - now there's some nice work.


149 posted on 12/26/2004 3:39:44 PM PST by clyde asbury (Khan, I'm laughing at the superior intellect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

I trust you had a Merry Christmas! Here's wishing you a Happy New Year! And thank you for the ping to the article.


150 posted on 12/26/2004 8:36:42 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson