Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three Dozen New Galaxies Are Found in Nearby Space
NY Times ^ | December 22, 2004 | DENNIS OVERBYE

Posted on 12/24/2004 6:07:04 PM PST by neverdem

Fourteen billion years after the Big Bang started it all, there is still life in the old cosmos.

Astronomers announced yesterday that they had discovered three dozen baby galaxies in what passes for nearby space in the universe - two billion to four billion light-years distant. The galaxies, which are blossoming with new stars at a prodigious rate, resemble the infant Milky Way 10 billion years ago, the astronomers said.

Studying these new galaxies could give cosmologists new insights into the processes by which galaxies and stars first formed out of clouds of primordial gas and dust at the beginning of time.

"It's like looking out your window and seeing a dinosaur walk by," said Dr. Tim Heckman of Johns Hopkins University, who led a team using a NASA satellite, the Galaxy Evolution Explorer, or Galex, to pinpoint the newborns. Dr. Heckman spoke in Pasadena, Calif., at a news conference at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which manages the satellite. A paper describing the results has been submitted to The Astrophysical Journal.

The babies were a pleasant surprise.

Like the parents of a woman of a certain age who long ago gave up hope of grandchildren, astronomers had given up hope that the universe was still producing galaxies that could grow up to be the size of the Milky Way. The heyday of making stars, the active ingredients of galaxies, was five billion to eight billion years ago. Perhaps only dwarf galaxies were being born today.

"We didn't know if there were any newborns still around or if this phase of cosmic creation is over," Dr. Heckman explained.

The baby galaxies appear as bluish blobs of light about 10,000 light-years across in images sent back by the Galex satellite, which was launched in 2003 on a 29-month mission to survey the sky for ultraviolet emissions.

Ultraviolet light, which has a shorter wavelength than visible light, is produced by the hottest, most massive stars, like those of the Pleiades cluster, which shines in the sky above Orion these frigid crystalline nights. Because such stars do not last very long, they are also among the youngest stars in the sky.

As a result, young galaxies stand out in ultraviolet light, said Dr. Chris Martin of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the principal investigator for the Galex project. "Ultraviolet traces star formation," Dr. Martin said.

The hitch for astronomers hoping to study the recent evolution of stars and galaxies is that the atmosphere blocks ultraviolet rays from reaching Earth. So ultraviolet astronomy can be pursued only in space, with instruments like the Hubble Space Telescope and Galex.

Galex is designed to spot the ultraviolet glows of young stars and galaxies and thus help fill in the history of star formation and cosmic evolution over the last 10 billion years. It has a specially designed 20-inch-diameter telescope with a field of view four times as big as a full moon.

The new babies are only the first results of the project, and the astronomers said they expected to find more, although not many.

While they are not nearly the size of mature galaxies like the Milky Way, which is about 100,000 light-years across and has about 200 billion stars, the newborn galaxies outshine them in ultraviolet by a factor of 100 or so, which means they are producing stars "at a prodigious rate," in the words of Dr. Martin.

Dr. Alice Shapley, a theorist at the University of California, described them as "stragglers" of the great wave of galaxy formation that peaked when the universe was half its present age.

It is important, Dr. Shapley said, to try to find out what is finally causing these galaxies to form now. Are they accreting fresh star material from outside, for example? Indeed, she said, astronomers still do not know for sure whether these are really new galaxies, or whether perhaps they are old galaxies, hiding old stars inside them, that are undergoing a new burst of star formation.

These would be ideal objects to study with the Hubble Space Telescope, she added.

What will happen to these newborns is another mystery, Dr. Heckman said.

The infant Milky Way coalesced out of the murk 10 billion years ago, when the universe was more crowded and baby galaxies could bang into one another, merge and grow. "It's less clear what will happen in the future," Dr Heckman said.

The universe is now a more diffuse place, and the baby galaxies may have been born into loneliness. If so, they will never grow up.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Technical; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: galex; nasa; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 next last
To: winodog
Do all the stars we see with the naked eye belong to our galaxy? The Milky Way.

Indeed they do. In fact, they are all pretty close. The universe is one big place! :-)

101 posted on 12/25/2004 7:28:39 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Boiler Plate
Kinda like finding the winning $500,000,000 powerball ticket in your coat pocket. You know it's this kind of stuff that makes you realize that we really don't know that much about the place we live in.

Indeed! :-)

102 posted on 12/25/2004 7:38:52 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf

Your pictures are awsome!! :-)

Thank you for posting them!


103 posted on 12/25/2004 7:41:28 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: edwin hubble
The Geminids were a surprise hit here. All over the sky.

WOW! :-)

104 posted on 12/25/2004 7:42:38 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Shryke
No photographs have ever moved me more than the deep field ones. Beyond breathtaking.

Indeed! If the Hubble Deep Field images won't overawe you into a sense of personal insignificance, you simply don't comprehend what you are seeing...

The instant I saw my first deep field image, the title of Brian Aldis' book, Galaxies Like Grains of Sand came to mind...

105 posted on 12/25/2004 7:50:59 AM PST by TXnMA (Attention, ACLU: There is no constitutionally protected right to NOT be offended -- Shove It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Thanks for the ping! This is interesting.

Merry Christmas to you and your family!


106 posted on 12/25/2004 8:05:22 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #107 Removed by Moderator

To: neverdem
Three Trillion New Galaxies Are Found in Nearby Space?

.........keep looking!

we don't want to miss any.

/sarcasm

108 posted on 12/25/2004 9:11:16 AM PST by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
Your pictures are awsome!! :-) Thank you for posting them!

Thanks RA. I have lots to learn in that area.

Merry Christmas, and have a happy and safe new year.

109 posted on 12/25/2004 9:27:03 AM PST by Joe Hadenuf (No more illegal alien sympathizers from Texas. America has one too many.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Yes and the universe is mind boggling. To think there are millions? of stars in our galaxy and there are billions? of galaxies.

I love sci fi. Is there a good web site that is "short and sweet" that explains in laymans terms the numbers of galaxies and the number of stars in each? I know that we are not able to count them all but there is probaly a web site that has pics such as the "basketball court" analogy.


110 posted on 12/25/2004 9:35:04 AM PST by winodog (We need to water the liberty tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

I might be wrong but I have read that the great galaxy in Andromeda can be visible to the naked eye under ideal conditions. Ditto for another in Triangulum although it is much fainter.


111 posted on 12/25/2004 9:43:11 AM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: xp38
Yes, basically it appears as a little fuzzy oval. All you really see, for the most part, is the hub.
112 posted on 12/25/2004 9:56:02 AM PST by inquest (Now is the time to remove the leftist influence from the GOP. "Unity" can wait.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: starfish923
"Fourteen billion years after the Big Bang started it all, there is still life in the old cosmos."

The GOOD LORD is NOT finished with us yet!

113 posted on 12/25/2004 10:11:22 AM PST by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Is GOD cool or WHAT ?
114 posted on 12/25/2004 10:23:28 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been ok'ed me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Most interesting.


115 posted on 12/25/2004 10:26:46 AM PST by Ciexyz (I use the term Blue Cities, not Blue States. PA is red except for Philly, Pgh & Erie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Do you know of a simple web site that shows us the different galaxies in their relationship to ours?


116 posted on 12/25/2004 10:35:15 AM PST by winodog (We need to water the liberty tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Baraonda
why they call it the Milky Way.

What do you think galaxy means?

117 posted on 12/25/2004 10:35:46 AM PST by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: winodog
There are more galaxies than there are stars in the Milky Way. And, that is just the visible universe. The rest of the universe, beyond the light horizon, is at least 1030 times that. Like comparing the size of a baseball to the size of the sun.
118 posted on 12/25/2004 10:39:11 AM PST by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Muttly just held a basebell up to the sun, and they look the same size to him.


119 posted on 12/25/2004 10:45:59 AM PST by PoorMuttly ("The right of the People to be Muttly shall not be infringed,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Its stuff like that that I am talking about. I cannot comphrend how large the universe is. I will have to spend some time at google to find a good site.


120 posted on 12/25/2004 11:11:47 AM PST by winodog (We need to water the liberty tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson