Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/24/2004 7:55:44 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The eco-whackos that she consults on policy ARE a special interest group. What the he!! is she talking about.
2 posted on 12/24/2004 8:00:18 AM PST by BenLurkin (Big government is still a big problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

I don't understand how this person can continue to talk with a face of plastic.


3 posted on 12/24/2004 8:01:45 AM PST by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"The regulations released by the Bush Administration today are an insult to every American who cares about our national forests. By greatly weakening critical protections, the regulations will increase the exploitation of our natural resources by private companies without ensuring the survival of the forests for future generations.

Yes Nancy, please explain to us how envirowhacko policies prevented a couple of million acres from burning to the ground over the last several years.

I believe a barf alert is called for...

4 posted on 12/24/2004 8:04:09 AM PST by TheSpottedOwl ("In the Kingdom of the Deluded, the Most Outrageous Liar is King".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
STFU, irrelevant hag.

5 posted on 12/24/2004 8:04:29 AM PST by andyandval
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Liberals have treated the Western States like mindless simpletons for decades. I see they're still at it. Keep it up, Nancy!


6 posted on 12/24/2004 8:06:21 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
It's interesting how Pelosi equates the interest of the public with her political party, isn't it?

And the idiot just lost an election.

7 posted on 12/24/2004 8:15:27 AM PST by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection; GVgirl; Grampa Dave
"was roundly and rightly criticized"

I'm having difficulty trying to separate what are her quotes, from what the story writer is saying! The selected editorial comment above, is in a paragraph that starts off with quotation marks, but no closing quotation marks!!!

If this paragraph wasn't entirely a quote of Nancy P's, then it is extreme, vulgar bias on the part of the reporter and Yahoo News!!!

8 posted on 12/24/2004 8:18:03 AM PST by SierraWasp (Moderates, are just too chicken to commit to any ideal!!! They prefer sophist sophistication...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Nancy should be aware that the make-up she puts on with a caulking gun is not environmentally sound...


9 posted on 12/24/2004 8:18:48 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

The self-styled scientists that "managed" the woodlands during the disastrous Klintoon admin, helped burn down hundreds of thousands of acres of pine forests in the West and we haven't forgotten. Only RATs and the Sierra Club forget their role in these fires. There's a sign placed by these idiots at the site of a huge forest fire on the North Rim of Grand Canyon that says that "forest fires are nature's way of cleansing forest brush and debris and making way for new growth." There are no more trees there for the envirowhacos to protect nor is new growth appearing. Perhaps if we wait two hundred years the trees might begin to grow again. Surely Pelosi will still be around to see them. As a vampire, she cannot taste death.


11 posted on 12/24/2004 8:22:58 AM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"The Administration instead pushed ahead with its plans to reduce the role of scientists and the public in managing our national forests, and the environment will pay the price."

The president IS responding to the public, Nancy. The so-called "scientists," with their no-cut policies stoked up some pretty devastating forest fires these last few years.

Nancy lives in a house made largely of wood just like the rest of us. She's just proving to be a mouthpiece for the environazis.

12 posted on 12/24/2004 8:27:10 AM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

2PAC Pelosi.. Go chop wood.


13 posted on 12/24/2004 8:34:25 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

And the extension of government ownership is what mainly distinguishes Socialism from other schemes for the improvement of man's lot in society: Socialists would nationalize productive property.

Into the hands of politicians and bureaucrats would come all titles to property; government would be the sole employer, and as the only employer, government would assign a task to each citizen and lay down the terms on which men would hold their jobs.

If this sounds like the army, it is because Socialism is in fact a militaristic organization of society. Socialism involves a command type of operation and, because "whosoever controls a man's subsistence controls the man," a socialist society becomes a minutely regulated bureaucratic tyranny. - Edmund A. Optiz, The Foundation for Economic Education, Inc.


21 posted on 12/24/2004 9:06:24 AM PST by sergeantdave (Help save the environment. Drop off your old tires and refrigerators at the Sierra Club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Whoever, whatever state, etc, put this sociopath wench in office, please. make her go away!
26 posted on 12/24/2004 9:41:15 AM PST by gidget7 (God Bless America, and our President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
...ensuring the survival of the forests for future generations.

Gee, Nancy, what are future generations going to do when a tree dies? It won't be around for them to admire. Ain't life cruel?

27 posted on 12/24/2004 9:43:55 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The national forests belong to the American people, but these regulations were written with the special interests, not the public interest, in mind.

Can we expect this philosopher to present a statement outlining what the public interest actually is? We are all supposed to know what special interest is, they must be teaching that in the public schools.

28 posted on 12/24/2004 9:47:37 AM PST by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Hey Nancybeotsch. Go to Show Lo AZ and spew this. Or even closer to home.


29 posted on 12/24/2004 9:52:40 AM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection; abbi_normal_2; Ace2U; adam_az; Alamo-Girl; Alas; alfons; alphadog; amom; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
30 posted on 12/24/2004 11:33:28 AM PST by farmfriend ( Congratulation. You are everything we've come to expect from years of government training.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The regulations released by the Bush Administration today are an insult to every American who cares about our national forests. By greatly weakening critical protections, the regulations will increase the exploitation of our natural resources by private companies without ensuring the survival of the forests for future generations.

After the San Bernardino fires, Nancy Pelosi and her dependent claque of green fascists pose the gravest single threat to forest health.

31 posted on 12/24/2004 11:45:49 AM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

message from ken to nancy:

your democrat left is a special interest.


32 posted on 12/24/2004 11:48:53 AM PST by ken21 (kerrycide = running 4 president on treasonous service in vietnam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
By greatly weakening critical protections, the regulations will increase the exploitation of our natural resources by private companies without ensuring the survival of the forests for future generations.

By overregulating the national lands, Pelosi will take meat off of the tables of American hunters, increase the mortgage debt of American homeowners by increasing construction material expenses, and steal the paychecks of thousands of American timberworkers.

36 posted on 12/24/2004 1:35:05 PM PST by HolgerDansk ("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered another round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson