-keep in mind reality -these arguments are pointless and really just mental exercise in futility because at the basis of these arguments is argument for 'rights' and 'laws' that are impossible.
If the 'rights' and 'laws' you suggest were inalienable they would not be clearly and authentically denied by the Creator.
If the 'rights' and 'laws' you suggest were not inalienable they would require to be enacted in contradiction to 'natural law' by the government.
Who is the government? -the government is the people that will never enact the 'rights' and 'laws' you suggest.
Judicial fiat, e.g. Massachusetts, is only temporary detour and delay to the will of the people.
Well said.
even n Mass. the will of the people will be heard. (in 2006)