To: Dad2Angels
Do opponents of same-sex marriage propose that our society should begin identifying areas where choices involving human intimacy should be regulated by government entities and thus dilute our commitment to the values inherent in a free society?
For this statement I will set aside my Christian values to speak in their terms.
Marriage, where they are concerned, is legal union that endows those involved with certain legal privileges and commitments. This in no way imposes govt regulation of human intimacy.
Just get over it, liberals! Same sex marriage has been rejected by every state that had a referendum on the issue. We're not telling you that you can't indulge in perversion. We're just saying you can't call it marriage! simple as that!
303 posted on
12/23/2004 11:43:35 AM PST by
superskunk
(Quinn's Law: Liberalism always produces the exact opposite of it's stated intent.)
To: superskunk
I understand what your saying.
I'm just not sure what part of my retort to the original poster is being retorted by your retort.
Care to retort?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson