A lot of African migrant workers live in all-male camps where homosexuality is practiced. A lot of others have sex with female prostitutes and spread it among themselves. Nothing is cut and dried.
We all want to live in a prosperous and decent society. As Sully points out, gays engage in "deviant sex act(s)" and their behavior as "social/health repercussions" by which I suppose he means expensive and dangerous health problems.
So I ask everyone again to focus on the issue of why we should allow such people to have any rights whatsoever. If gays are a danger to good order, a danger to health, a danger to morals, a danger to children, a danger to all that is good in a decent society---why permit them to influence public policy by allowing them to vote or publish articles or run for office or participate in anything which might cause someone to praise them or regard them in positive terms?
As Judith has candidly pointed out, there are many employment categories that should be forbidden to gays and bi-sexuals.
As others have mentioned, homosexuality is "against God's law" -- and, thus, we presumably "offend God" by doing anything that facilitates or endorses homosexual behavior or objectives.