Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Parachute System Can Save Small Planes
Yahoo! Finance ^ | December 22, 2004 | Ted Bridis

Posted on 12/23/2004 6:21:20 AM PST by MississippiMasterpiece

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: dalereed

That would have scared the crap out of me! Not enough to close my eyes and spiral 16K feet to certain death.


41 posted on 12/23/2004 9:51:22 AM PST by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Do doctors have a high crash rate?

High enough, it would seem, that the V-tail Beechcraft Bonanza acquired the nickname "Doctor Killer"


42 posted on 12/23/2004 10:27:53 AM PST by Denver Ditdat (Ronald Reagan belongs to the ages now, but we preferred it when he belonged to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Denver Ditdat

Forked Tailed Doctor Killer.


Kinda funny, they are the easiest airplane to fly I've ever encountered.


43 posted on 12/23/2004 10:50:04 AM PST by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
I know nothing about aviation, but if I'm not mistaken, don't most plane crashes occur either shortly after takeoff, or as the plane is landing? If that's the case, it seems to me that, by the time the pilot realizes that a crash is imminent, there would not enough time for the parachute to be deployed. Also, the plane would be too low at that point for a parachute to be effective.
44 posted on 12/23/2004 10:59:22 AM PST by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeGrande

>>If a plane is capable of recovering from a spin, why would anyone want to pull a chute and crash land with the resulting damage?<<

How about engine failure at night, over mountains or in hard IMC ? Control surface or structural failure? You might get lucky and fly your way out of these situations, but if it's me and I have the option, I'll take the slow ride down under the canopy and let the insurance company worry about the damage to the plane.


45 posted on 12/23/2004 11:45:50 AM PST by StudPilot (Thank God we don't get all the government we pay for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2
Cirrus makes excellent aircraft. Bush visited their factory in Minnesota during his campaign.

Agreed. And I didn't realize that W visited the Cirrus factory - great! They're building and selling planes at an amazing rate. I am so happy for the Klapmeier brothers - two truly nice guys who had a great idea. Starting in the experimental regime, and refining from there to become certified ... AND running the company like a business - good for them!

I got a demo ride in a G2 to Oshkosh this year ... niiiiice plane!

46 posted on 12/23/2004 2:08:25 PM PST by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2

Agree about spins. I took an hour of spin training in a 152 Aerobat before I soloed. I am VERY glad I did - especially when it came time to practice the stall series solo.


47 posted on 12/23/2004 2:13:40 PM PST by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet

Unfortunately, one of the major causes of takeoff accidents is the departure of the pilot's actions from their training. Depending on the point during takeoff when you lose power (or whatever), some pilots attempts to turn back to the field (not even landing downwind, but going for the same direction as their takeoff!) too low or too close, instead of landing straight ahead, or if that's not possible, choosing a different place to set down.


48 posted on 12/23/2004 2:36:06 PM PST by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: StudPilot
How about engine failure at night, over mountains or in hard IMC ?

I have had an engine failure at night over mountains. I landed safely at an airport. Obviously hard IMC would make it tougher. I try to follow Chuck Yaegers precepts and try to avoid three challenges because I can only handle two : )

Control surface or structural failure?

Sure I would like a parachute then : )

You might get lucky and fly your way out of these situations, but if it's me and I have the option, I'll take the slow ride down under the canopy and let the insurance company worry about the damage to the plane.

What is the difference between descending at 800 fpm and 35 mph or descending at 1200 fpm with no forward speed?

On a more practical note, the Cirrus has around a 600 pound payload with full fuel. That effectively makes it a three seater with zero baggage allowance.

So everyone is going to fly the plane over gross. That means more stalls, longer takeoffs, longer landings, slower cruise, higher fuel burn, etc. The last 70 lbs can make a big difference.

Since most accidents occur during take off and landing anything that increases my chance of a stall is to be avoided (weight mostly). An extra 70 pounds of useless parachute certainly won't help me when I am trying to recover from a stall at 500'.

49 posted on 12/24/2004 3:48:52 PM PST by LeGrande
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2
What avaiation "expert" would even suggest think this would work on a 747? why not just install 300 ejection seats?

In a class of mine we discuss ways to "system engineer" a safe crash landing system. Ejector seats have a concern since they depend on the weight of the passenger. But a section of seats might be successful or a system that weighed the passengers and adjusted the chute. The plane would also have to be separated using pyrotechnics to allow the smaller sections to be free to open their chutes.

50 posted on 12/24/2004 4:06:44 PM PST by KC_for_Freedom (Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: demlosers; MississippiMasterpiece

<< Do doctors have a high crash rate? >>

Off the top of my [Forty+ years career Aviator's] head -- and having had several medico partners through the years -- I'd venture the highest of any profesion.

Poor fellows also cannot write legibly and/or run businesses!


51 posted on 12/27/2004 2:18:18 PM PST by Brian Allen (For there is born to you this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord -- Luke 2:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece
The emergency parachutes aren't flawless. Two families in Syracuse, N.Y., are suing Cirrus, Ballistic Recovery Systems and others for a combined $67.5 million over a fatal crash in April 2002. The case is pending in federal court.

The families said the pilot, a plastic surgeon who bought the plane six days earlier, tried to open the parachute but it failed. Defense lawyers have denied the system malfunctioned, and federal investigators concluded the parachute never opened "for undetermined reasons."

Sheesh. If the plane had not been equipped with a chute wouldn't the guy be just as dead? Seems like the lawyers needed another plaintiff as the plane manufacturer doesn't have deep enough pockets.

52 posted on 12/29/2004 12:09:44 PM PST by hattend (Christ is the reason for the season)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson