It is hardly my fault that you mis-read me, nor that you evidently have no sustantive response.
I tried to engage you on a factual level, ealing with openly available evidence. You don't feel up to it, that's your affair.
Dan
You wrote; "To me, "G-d" is the abbreviation of a well-known blasphemy."
I wrote: "Your initial claim was that G_d was a shorthand blasphemy. It is in fact a way for Jewish people to avoid what they consider blasphemy."
If you consider that to be a mis-reading of your comment, then the fault does indeed lie with your communication skills, for I cannot see any other way to interpret you.
My "substantive response" was not refuted by you. You instead went off on a tangent about how the Jews are wrong, in your opinion, to avoid the casual use of the Lord in their writing. What that had to do with your assuming that "G_d is abbreviation of a well-known blasphemy", when it clearly isn't, I have no idea.