Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LexBaird
Common, yes. Convincing, no. Biblically justifiable, not even close.

And about as effective as telling someone to go "f***k" himelf, and then explaining that you really meant "frisk."

Dan

106 posted on 12/23/2004 10:13:06 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: BibChr
Common, yes. Convincing, no. Biblically justifiable, not even close.

I'll go with my Jewish friends here. It is they who will not spell the name of the Lord. As for biblical justification, try the Ten Commandments.

"This command originally intended to prohibit taking false oaths. More than that, it also forbade disrespect shown to God by using his name wrongly or frivolously. God's name was special. It was the nearest the Israelites came to possessing any part of God, and had to be treated with the utmost care. Later Jewish practice takes this prohibition so seriously that the name of God, and even the word God, was never spoken, with phrases such as "the Lord" and "the Name" used in its place, and G_d used in print." (http://www.hope.edu/academic/religion/bandstra/RTOT/CH3/CH3_2B1.HTM)

112 posted on 12/23/2004 10:37:52 AM PST by LexBaird ("Democracy can withstand anything but democrats" --Jubal Harshaw (RA Heinlein))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: BibChr
>And about as effective as telling someone to go "f***k"
>himelf, and then explaining that you really meant "frisk."

Well, what other 5 letter word starts with f and ends with k?
135 posted on 12/23/2004 2:45:05 PM PST by Starter ( "You know, if seasonal holiday depression has a sound track, this is it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson