Posted on 12/23/2004 5:41:02 AM PST by conservativecorner
The truth trickles out. "It now appears that the premise of the question that caused an uproar around Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was, so to speak, off base," FNC's Brit Hume noted Tuesday night in reminding viewers how two weeks ago National Guardsman "Thomas Wilson said to Rumsfeld, quote, 'our vehicles are not armored, we do not have proper armament vehicles to carry with us north,' into Iraq." But, Hume relayed, "according to senior Army officers, about 800 of the 830 vehicles in Wilson's Army regiment, the 278th Calvary, had already been up-armored" at the time of his widely publicized question. Some Hearst newspapers reported that fact last week and since then it has trickled up the media stream into NewsMax, the Washington Times and FNC, but not the other networks or major newspapers.
The night of the December 15 Pentagon briefing on the armor situation, CBS Evening News anchor Dan Rather was oblivious to the revelation as he delivered this short item which repeated the National Guardsman's charge: "The U.S. Army said today it will spend more than $4 billion in the next few months in a belated effort to ensure that all its vehicles in Iraq have armor to protect troops inside. The promise came one week after a soldier complained to Defense Secretary Rumsfeld about having to scrounge in trash heaps for makeshift armor."
At that briefing, Army Major General Stephen Speakes, U.S. Army G-8, Force Development, also noted that the remaining vehicles in the Tennessee's National Guard unit were up-armored within 24 hours of the question being posed. Other networks ran clips of Speakes' explanation of the levels of armor and how they are applied, but nothing on the premise of the question which Chattanooga Times Free Press reporter Edward Lee Pitts boasted of placing with the National Guardsman.
In his e-mail back to his editors after the event in Kuwait, Pitts leveled the charge about armor in recounting that in talking with members of the Guard unit with which he was embedded, "before hand we worked on questions to ask Rumsfeld about the appalling lack of armor their vehicles going into combat have. While waiting for the VIP, I went and found the Sgt. in charge of the microphone for the question and answer session and made sure he knew to get my guys out of the crowd."
For more on the Pitts question, see the December 10 CyberAlert: www.mediaresearch.org
For his e-mail in its entirety, as posted by Romenesko on the Poynter Institute site: poynter.org
For the transcript of the December 15 DOD session, "Special Defense Department Briefing on Uparmoring HMMWV," see: www.defenselink.mil
Hume seemingly picked up the disclosure from Greg Pierce's December 21 "Inside Politics" column, which cited a NewsMax.com article:
...."According to the Maryville, Tenn., Daily Times -- a rival to Pitts' paper -- Army Maj. Gen. Stephen Speakes and Army Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sorenson said during last week's Pentagon briefing that routine pre-deployment preparations before proceeding to Iraq included adding protective armor plates to the last 20 vehicles of the Tennessee-based 278th Regimental Combat Team's 830 vehicles.
"'When the question was asked, 20 vehicles remained to be up-armored at that point,' Gen. Speakes said, in comments completely ignored by the major media.
"'We completed those 20 vehicles in the next day,' he said. 'In other words, we completed all the armoring within 24 hours of the time the question was asked,' Gen. Speakes added.
"The eye-opening revelations by Gen. Speakes and Gen. Sorenson first gained national exposure on FreeRepublic.com late Friday."
END of Excerpt
For Pierce's weekday column: www.washingtontimes.com
For the Sunday, December 19 NewsMax.com article, "Rumsfeld's Questioner Wrong About Unit's Armor," attributed to "Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com staff," go to: www.newsmax.com
In fact, that Friday Maryville newspaper article was not original and was attributed to "wire services": www.thedailytimes.com
Hearst Newspapers reporter Stewart Powell deserves the credit for first recounting what Speakes revealed deep into the December 15 briefing. I checked a bunch of Hearst papers for the story and couldn't find it in several, but did locate it in the December 16 Beaumont Enterprise. An excerpt from, "Unit's armor finished up after query of Rumsfeld," the story by Powell who works out of Hearst's Washington bureau:
Within 24 hours after a low-ranking soldier challenged Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld about armor shortages in Iraq, protective armor had been added to every vehicle in the soldier's unit, senior Army officers said Wednesday.
Army Maj. Gen. Stephen Speakes and Army Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sorenson, senior members of the Army's combat systems development and acquisition team at the Pentagon, said protective armor plates were added to the last 20 vehicles of the Tennessee-based 278th Regimental Combat Team's 830 vehicles shortly after the confrontation with Rumsfeld.
The generals said it was part of routine, pre-deployment preparations in Kuwait before the unit proceeded into Iraq.
"When the question was asked, 20 vehicles remained to be up-armored at that point," Speakes told a Pentagon briefing. "We completed those 20 vehicles in the next day....In other words, we completed all the armoring within 24 hours of the time the question was asked."...
Speakes said Wilson might not have known that the Army was working under "an existing program" to add armor to the last of the unit's vehicles when he questioned Rumsfeld. By the time Wilson's unit headed into Iraq, Speakes said it had 252 vehicles with bolt-on armor plate produced as $7,000-to-$11,000 add-on kits in the United States and shipped to Kuwait for installation.
Another 459 vehicles had less protective, locally fabricated armor plate installed by GIs in Kuwait -- armor known to GIs as "hillbilly armor." Wilson's question referred to that type of ad hoc armor. The unit picked up another 119 armored Humvees upon arrival in Iraq that had been left behind by departing combat units, Speakes said....
END of Excerpt
For the December 16 Beaumont Enterprise article in full: www.southeasttexaslive.com
As of this morning it hadn't made it to CNN, either. Go figure.
Ok. Quick! Who wants to bet on the over/under for how many MSM outlets cover this story?
I'm betting ONE.
It's almost like there's a liberal bias out there, but we know that can't be true. END SARCASM!!
Care to tell all these nice folks your personal observations of this armor?
There are none so blind...
bttt
I'll take the under.
The foundational premise of Accuracy In Media and the Media Research Center is that journalism is or should be about truth. It is not. Journalism is about creating the impression that journalism is important to the public. PR, and nothing more.
The silly MSM is cruisin' for a major loss as this kind of distortion is revealed and defenders of truth refuse to relent.
The contrast between the independent, unpaid news-seekers like Freepers and bloggers- and the paid, "professional" journalist class could NOT be clearer.
Notice in the article it states that new facts were FIRST made public on Free Republic:)
Got to wonder if Pitts is staying with this Unit or if he is back in the US? Personally, I would not want this guy anywhere near me if I were heading into Iraq, who knows what he will attempt next.
So we not only have a moron Army Spec who didn't know this already but was hoodwinked by a clown reporter into asking the question that sandbagged Rummy who was misquoted by the MSM...
But none of this will be reported by the three stooges tonight at 6:30 local times...LMAO
MERRY CHRISTMAS!
Semper Fi,
Kelly
I just get the impression that the MSM types would be happier if they were circus freak show barkers.
I meant to mention the fact in my title, but it completely slipped my mind. Growing old ain't for sissies!
______________________________________________________________
"The eye-opening revelations by Gen. Speakes and Gen. Sorenson first gained national exposure on FreeRepublic.com late Friday."
Important or not, and I do agree that the first job of the media is to sell advertising and make money, journalism is effective at forming a worldview (sometime a deliberately inaccurate worldview) in the minds of many who partake. That is, media is an effective propaganda tool, and free-thinking people know that claims of objectivity are made mostly to maintain an illusion.
There will always be people who are easily misled, but society is better off when the vast majority of the public views all sources of information with scepticism.
I told a lib about this story and he said it didn't matter.
That the damage has already been done to Rumsfeld.
I think they are finally admitting that the truth isn't really very important to them.
ping
It is no surprise...
You cant come up here without Armor anymore. The rules state that is so.
The units dont move forward until that is in place.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.