To: anniegetyourgun
I don't mean to be an ogre or anything, and I am not unsympathetic to a young life taken, but I say oh well. She tried killing a poor unborn human baby because she was too irresponsible to do the right thing. Why should the child have been punished? I almost want to say that it servers her right.
31 posted on
12/22/2004 7:27:10 PM PST by
metalmanx2j
(Thank the Good Lord for George W. Bush)
To: metalmanx2j
I don't mean to be an ogre or anything, and I am not unsympathetic to a young life taken, but I say oh well. She tried killing a poor unborn human baby because she was too irresponsible to do the right thing. Why should the child have been punished? I almost want to say that it servers her right.
I agree with you ... but should make the point that though we might *not* be ogres, other adults (like us) *are*. These monsters teach our children that premarital sex and abortion are more than tolerated; they are normal. The child was stupid -- but only because she had stupid teachers and role models. And those teachers and role models are *our* peers. When the "bony finger" wags, it will wag at more than just the girl. It also wags at the stupid adults and at us for not putting a stop to the agenda of the stupid adults.
32 posted on
12/22/2004 7:46:45 PM PST by
so_real
(It's all about sharing the Weather)
To: metalmanx2j; so_real
I don't dismiss her bad choices. My commentary is about the FDA approval of this harmful procedure - which actually takes place outside a doctor's perview. If ever there was a case of product liability, this is one. Certainly that is true if we have a media that goes bananas over something far less lethal like Naproxen in Aleve. I blame the FDA's willingness to be manipulated by the Clinton administration and their feminist/abortion-industry compatriots. No one deserves bad medicine - especially when peddled by folks with a political agenda.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson