What do you want to debate about H. R. 3893
If a state agency makes, public personal information about me that results in identity theft or other damages what recourse would I have if the federal courts have no authority to rule on a privacy rights issue?
87 posted on 12/23/2004 12:20:19 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
The Supreme Court of the United States and each Federal court--
(1) shall not adjudicate--
(A) any claim involving the laws, regulations, or policies of any State or unit of local government relating to the free exercise or establishment of religion;
(B) any claim based upon the right of privacy, including any such claim related to any issue of sexual practices, orientation, or reproduction; or
(C) any claim based upon equal protection of the laws to the extent such claim is based upon the right to marry without regard to sex or sexual orientation; and
90 posted on 12/23/2004 12:45:18 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
Sodomy and abortion are acts deemed to infringe on individual privacy by federal courts and some state courts, and have nothing to do with any state agency making public personal information about me that results in identity theft or other damages.
THE BILL IS AUTHORED BY RON PAUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If you have any friend against federal intrusion of your privacy in Congress, it is RON PAUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So the "right to privacy" is only about sodomy and abortion, and there are no other privacy issues that might need to be decided by a federal court?