To: jonestown
- Suppose the California Court of Criminal Appeals opined that the California 'law' prohibiting assault weapons is Constitutional.
- If SCOTUS were prohibited from reviewing such cases (H. R. 3893), the entire country would be affected as any State or local government could then safely ignore our 2nd Amendment.
What will you do when SCOTUS agrees with California Court of Criminal Appeals?
88 posted on
12/23/2004 12:28:34 PM PST by
Ed Current
(U.S. Constitution, Article 3 has no constituency to break federal judicial tyranny)
To: Ed Current
jones:
Suppose the California Court of Criminal Appeals opined that the California 'law' prohibiting assault weapons is Constitutional.
If SCOTUS were prohibited from reviewing such cases (H. R. 3893), the entire country would be affected as any State or local government could then safely ignore our 2nd Amendment.
What will you do when SCOTUS agrees with California Court of Criminal Appeals?
88 Ed Current
Rest assured Ed, I would fight, -- just as I fight bills like HR 3893.
Which leads to the question, - seeing you support HR 3893, a bill that would alter the balance of power, would you obey a rogue legislature like California's?
92 posted on
12/23/2004 12:58:35 PM PST by
jonestown
( JONESTOWN, TX http://www.tsha.utexas.edu)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson