Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jonestown
  1. Suppose the California Court of Criminal Appeals opined that the California 'law' prohibiting assault weapons is Constitutional.
  2. If SCOTUS were prohibited from reviewing such cases (H. R. 3893), the entire country would be affected as any State or local government could then safely ignore our 2nd Amendment.

What will you do when SCOTUS agrees with California Court of Criminal Appeals?

88 posted on 12/23/2004 12:28:34 PM PST by Ed Current (U.S. Constitution, Article 3 has no constituency to break federal judicial tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: Ed Current
jones:
Suppose the California Court of Criminal Appeals opined that the California 'law' prohibiting assault weapons is Constitutional.

If SCOTUS were prohibited from reviewing such cases (H. R. 3893), the entire country would be affected as any State or local government could then safely ignore our 2nd Amendment.






What will you do when SCOTUS agrees with California Court of Criminal Appeals?
88 Ed Current






Rest assured Ed, I would fight, -- just as I fight bills like HR 3893.

Which leads to the question, - seeing you support HR 3893, a bill that would alter the balance of power, would you obey a rogue legislature like California's?
92 posted on 12/23/2004 12:58:35 PM PST by jonestown ( JONESTOWN, TX http://www.tsha.utexas.edu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson