Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ed Current

I'm still convinced that until several Federal Judges (including Ginsberg on SCOTUS) are impeached and removed in disgrace, the judicial tyranny will continue unabated.


63 posted on 12/23/2004 7:44:42 AM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN

I'm still convinced that until several Federal Judges (including Ginsberg on SCOTUS) are impeached and removed in disgrace, the judicial tyranny will continue unabated.

You need 67 SENATORS to remove a federal judge. The GOP only has 55 with at least 5 being no different than a DemoNcrat.

So, you are at least 17 Senators short of removing any federal judge.

ARTICLE III removes the cases from the judges and requires only 51 Senators, a simple majority in the U.S. House and the President.

The V.P. votes in a 50/50 tie in the Senate, so there is a possiblity that the bill would pass.

Impeachment, at this point in time, is as impossible as a Pro-Life Amendment.

65 posted on 12/23/2004 8:17:29 AM PST by Ed Current (U.S. Constitution, Article 3 has no constituency to break federal judicial tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson