[bummerdude]

FYI. You should put in the summary of the article what point you're trying to make by posting this, to get the interest of people like me who don't want to read through pages and pages to see what this is about.

[Ed Current]

FYI. You should put in the summary of the article what point you're trying to make by posting this, to get the interest of people like me who don't want to read through pages and pages to see what this is about.

The article is a bill. Post #1 gives the conceptual background for the bill. Those who understand the Constitution need no background.

As you can plainly see, tacticalogic & jonestown remain clueless anyway.

However, everyone else seems to get it, one way or the other.

[jonestown]

Ed Current
As explained in post #1, there isn't any balance of power. SCOTUS has assumed it all.

---

The 'balance of power' is being abused by all three federal branches, and, -- by all State & local governments.
SCOTUS only has as much power as the rest of the political establishment allows it to have.
38 jones

---

How right you are.
41 Ed Current

---

Then you agree, "SCOTUS has [not] assumed it all".
-- SCOTUS only has as much power as the rest of the political establishment allows it to have.
44 jones

---

To: bummerdude;

As you can plainly see, tacticalogic & jonestown remain clueless anyway.
However, everyone else seems to get it, one way or the other.
46 Ed Current

---

Bummer, -- as you can plainly see, - Ed can't even explain his own misconceptions about the balance of power.
Which makes him the "clueless" one.