Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
Damn. The 767 is not exactly a fuel hog like the L-1011 was.

I don't understand why the US Air Force doesn't buy the best used 767s for conversion to tankers. Why do we have to buy new 767 tankers at the end of the 767 production run that will last 50 to 60 years after the line closes? The military puts a lot less time on their transport planes than commercial users do. They could save lots of money by buying used aircraft that still have lots of life left in them.

44 posted on 12/22/2004 10:37:22 AM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Paleo Conservative

Agree. I would like to see the official number crunching to dispute this. Remember that lease deal regarding these tankers? This is what happens when government types make decisions instead of corporate types.


46 posted on 12/22/2004 10:45:53 AM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (John Kerry--three fake Purple Hearts. George Bush--one real heart of gold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson