"They evolved together."
Huh? Or, to put it more succinctly, Huh?
Huh? Or, to put it more succinctly, Huh?
Does poofism cripple the mind, or is it an incapable mind that is prone to poofism? The point was that evolution is just that--evolution. An Arabian stallian likely did not pop out of the womb of an eohippus.
Huh? Or, to put it more succinctly, Huh?
The question was, "What came first? The modern day human mother able to fully care for all the needs of the modern day human infant or the modern day human infant that will grow up to be such a mother?"
The implication is that one must exist first to make the other one possible.
The answer, as I posted, was that such "evolution" takes place gradually with small changes to generations of both mothers and infants over time. They therefore "evolved together".
What is so hard to understand about that?
An analogous question would be, "What what came first? The Modern English-speaking mother or the Modern English-speaking offspring?
The answer is, "Neither".
English, as all languages, is constantly evolving with changes in each generation. The evolution from the English of Chaucer to American Modern English was a gradual change with both mothers and offspspring "evolving that language together" in the time between Chaucer and today.