This is my point exactly. Scientific evidence is considered by most as absolute proof, when in fact the equations keep changing. Darwinism is considered science, so therefore people believe it must be an indisputable truth. I was first introduced to Darwinism in a middle school science class. No alternative "theory" was allowed to be discussed.
Natural selection cannot explain the existance of mankind. Generational variations in the genetics of lifeforms, cross-breeding, and environmental adaptation cannot explain the leap from single-celled organisms to human beings.
"Most" who? Not ANY scientists.