Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spinestein
" I can carry this postulate back a thousand generations, and guess what? There isn't a monkey or a fish in my family tree. "

Sorry again, 1000 generations is waaaaaaaaaay too short a time period for that to be seen.

So exactly how many generations do I have to go back before I have a monkey in my family tree? Ten thousand? A million? There is no evidence of human beings existing that far back. So where is the missing link? Where are the fossil remains of pseudo human life? Who procreated with the gorilla to produce the human? What environmental factors resulted in fish turning into people? When did they start crawling out of the muck?

Using your much-vaunted "scientific method," I'm sure you have the answer supported by hard science. Or at least you "probably" have a "viable theory" based upon "conclusions" that are "reasonable to suggest."

Your scientific method is what comes out the south end of a north-bound horse.

God created me. If you're the offspring of lesser primates, then that's your problem.

205 posted on 12/22/2004 7:40:00 AM PST by highimpact (The only way to defeat terrorism is to annihilate the terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: highimpact
" Using your much-vaunted "scientific method," I'm sure you have the answer supported by hard science. Or at least you "probably" have a "viable theory" based upon "conclusions" that are "reasonable to suggest." Your scientific method is what comes out the south end of a north-bound horse. "

If you don't have a use for "the scientific method" then fine, you don't have to use it. But when you claim that some scientific theory that you don't like is bogus, you can't use scientific arguments to debunk it and still have credibility.

YOUR interpretation of the Bible leads you to believe that evolution is bogus and you hold that on faith alone, so debating anything about the subject using science is pointless.
210 posted on 12/22/2004 7:57:54 AM PST by spinestein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

To: highimpact
So where is the missing link? Where are the fossil remains of pseudo human life? ... Using your much-vaunted "scientific method," I'm sure you have the answer supported by hard science. Or at least you "probably" have a "viable theory" based upon "conclusions" that are "reasonable to suggest." Your scientific method is what comes out the south end of a north-bound horse. God created me. If you're the offspring of lesser primates, then that's your problem.

Human Ancestors.
The Evidence for Human Evolution.
Comparison of all Hominid skulls.

I've posted these next links before, but they're needed again:
The Theory of Evolution. (Excellent introductory encyclopedia article.)
It might help to learn what science is: The scientific method.

214 posted on 12/22/2004 9:41:20 AM PST by PatrickHenry (The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

To: highimpact
Where are the fossil remains of pseudo human life?

Hominid Fossils

215 posted on 12/22/2004 10:47:56 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

To: highimpact
So exactly how many generations do I have to go back before I have a monkey in my family tree? Ten thousand? A million? There is no evidence of human beings existing that far back.

Uh, actually, there is.

236 posted on 12/22/2004 3:40:11 PM PST by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson