[F16Fighter]

"When people run out of valid arguments, the tendency is to revert to 'cheap shots'. Once again, we are observing an instance of this posted by one of the lil' boys :-)."

FWIW, it is courtesy and protocol here at FR to ping the person you're talking about.

My dear (please don't sue me for slander) -- the ONLY "arguments" you have made this entire thread is thusly:

1) njwoman is a "strong, confident, successful" woman whose attributes clearly threaten men.

2) njwoman is an attractive woman ("please check out my pic for further "proof.")

3) "Conservative" njwoman is in all reality a feminist who prefers to wear the pants in her family 50.1% of the time; NOT 49.9999%.

According to my unscientific data, I'm going to assume your "pool" of eligible gentlemen who have succumbed to your "warmth" and "charm" and "class" to be limited to those men who've graduated with honors from the 'Phil Donohue Academy of the Damned'.

[Quinotto]

Actually njwoman was advocating for equality and not for her wearing the pants (even though she might look better than you in them). :) Chill out, dude, you are talking this way too personal!