Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fr_freak

> By this I mean there has to be hard-wired into the organism a trigger that causes it to put into motion the reproductive mechanisms that it has.

Considering that the precursor molecules to the very simplest things maybe called life are themselves self-replicating, and not due to any desire on their part, but just part of the mechanism... it would not be surprisign if early life was equally as prolific and yet as disinterested.

> Viruses, by the way, cannot replicate themselves.

They seem to be quite capable of it.


262 posted on 12/23/2004 5:23:39 AM PST by orionblamblam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]


To: orionblamblam
> Viruses, by the way, cannot replicate themselves.

They seem to be quite capable of it.


I'm not a Biology major, but if I recall correctly viruses require a host cell to infect in order to reproduce. I think it's safe to assume that if a virus was the first life on Earth, it did not have a host cell to infect.

The Difference Between Bacteria and Viruses
263 posted on 12/23/2004 10:26:10 AM PST by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson