To: Hat-Trick
Please see post #36. There were several copies penned at the time and sent to the various States for ratification. If there were grammatical errors, then our Constitution is "technically" void. According to our laws, all legislation submitted like this must be identical.
This isn't a "deal breaker" IMO, but I'm positive there are scum sucking lawyers and opportunist politicians that would try to exploit it.
37 posted on
12/21/2004 8:07:30 AM PST by
Dead Corpse
(Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
To: Dead Corpse; susiek
I stand corrected, after looking at the posted image - there are definitely three commas. I cut and pasted from www.billofrights.org.
38 posted on
12/21/2004 8:54:12 AM PST by
Hat-Trick
(Do you trust a government that cannot trust you with guns?)
To: Dead Corpse; susiek
I'm going to read
this thread as it appears to have been addressed on FR already.
41 posted on
12/21/2004 9:03:45 AM PST by
Hat-Trick
(Do you trust a government that cannot trust you with guns?)
To: Dead Corpse
This isn't a "deal breaker" IMO, but I'm positive there are scum sucking lawyers and opportunist politicians that would try to exploit it.Well I'm all for it as long as the scum suckers scrutinize the First Amendment, find no mention of electronic press, and therefore exclude TV, Radio, Hollywood, porno and the Internet from First Amendment protections. (/sarcasm)
53 posted on
12/21/2004 10:15:41 AM PST by
elbucko
(Feral Republican)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson