Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH'S IMMIGRATION PET PHRASES
michellemalkin.com ^ | 12/20/2004 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 12/20/2004 12:21:42 PM PST by nanak

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 321-329 next last
To: FITZ
And Mexico does great things for it's elderly??? How does bringing all of Mexico to the USA improve the lives of the elderly here?

LOL! Nick says it will save America. He says we need 60 million more illegal aliens so people can retire.

Yeowza!

261 posted on 12/20/2004 10:04:12 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf (No more illegal alien sympathizers from Texas. America has one too many.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: 4Freedom

Marked for later reading.


262 posted on 12/20/2004 11:34:47 PM PST by 4Freedom (America is no longer the 'Land of Opportunity', it's the 'Land of Illegal Alien Opportunists'!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf

Don't put words in my mouth. What I said was, we have to do that, or have lots of babies fast, or we'll find ourselves having to decide which old people to snuff. You keep trying to turn it into people playing on a golf course. The issue is whether we have to kill them... or "encourage" them to go die.

263 posted on 12/21/2004 1:32:28 AM PST by Nick Danger (Want some wood?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Don't put words in my mouth.

That is what Joe does best.

264 posted on 12/21/2004 1:35:02 AM PST by Texasforever (It's hard to kiss the lips at night that chew your butt out all day long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster

bttt


265 posted on 12/21/2004 2:09:05 AM PST by lainde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Fatalis; Poohbah; Nick Danger

Won't stop jury nullification - if the jury still thinks he did nothing wrong, they will still acquit. In case you didn't notice, the case Poohbah mentioned involved the documents being printed on FAX PAPER.

The jury acquitted in 15 minutes.

It won't matter whether or not your verification program is mandatory. You've got to convince a jury to acquit. So far, they haven't.


266 posted on 12/21/2004 4:58:28 AM PST by hchutch (A pro-artificial turf, pro-designated hitter baseball fan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger

I have been watchling the social security threads and nowhere in the articles does the press mention the Totalization Agreement with Mexico. Why expand a failing program? It is a fact that Mexicans are not reproducing like they once did so therefore we will have many more older Mexicans on the dole. Do we snuff these people too?


267 posted on 12/21/2004 5:07:17 AM PST by texastoo (a "has-been" Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
It won't matter whether or not your verification program is mandatory. You've got to convince a jury to acquit. So far, they haven't.

We'll see, won't we? So far no jury has heard a case where mandatory workplace verification was violated.

268 posted on 12/21/2004 5:10:26 AM PST by Fatalis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah

Normally, I don't pay attention to "he said, she said" statements especially when they are stated as facts. With your statements you have implied that all juries would acquit any one who has hired illegals. Back it up with facts, not "he said, she said" statements.


269 posted on 12/21/2004 5:12:48 AM PST by texastoo (a "has-been" Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
FAX PAPER

In other words, "he said, she said" it was fax paper. For some reason without the case cited, I don't think we will ever know.

270 posted on 12/21/2004 5:18:19 AM PST by texastoo (a "has-been" Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
That's the biggest joke about the "guest worker" plan --- and people who applaud it by saying we can't send them back now ---- but boy in 3 years we're going to find a way!

Bingo. When Bush claims there will ever be an enforcement part to his sleazy scheme, he's lying. He can't be bothered to enforce immigration law now. Why would he in the future?

271 posted on 12/21/2004 5:19:19 AM PST by dagnabbit (Defeat George Bush's Dishonest Amnesty Scheme. No Mexico Merger. No Global Labor Market.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: texastoo; hchutch
Normally, I don't pay attention to "he said, she said" statements especially when they are stated as facts.

Actually, you pay attention to "he said, she said" statements if you agree with them.

With your statements you have implied that all juries would acquit any one who has hired illegals.

There may be an odd jury that convicts, but the general rule is that they acquit.

Back it up with facts, not "he said, she said" statements.

OK, here's the biggest fact: US Attorneys get bonuses (aka "pro pay" or "proficiency pay"), raises, and promotions based on their conviction rates.

High conviction rates equal lots of money rolling in.

The refusal of US Attorneys to spend time on prosecuting employers is quite telling in this context. A US Attorney would indict his own grandmother if he thought he would get a conviction. Conversely, they aren't going to spend time on cases that are likely to end in acquittals.

272 posted on 12/21/2004 5:21:05 AM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
The conviction rate may go up if the verification is mandatory, and the employers refuse to do it. But that's as much an experiment as any other change would be. Until the convictions are there, we won't know.
273 posted on 12/21/2004 5:23:57 AM PST by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld
Good point. Maybe a strengthened border patrol could be part of this new deal...
274 posted on 12/21/2004 5:26:22 AM PST by todd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
There may be an odd jury that convicts, but the general rule is that they acquit.

Under the old rules, perhaps, but those rules are in the process of becoming obsolete as workplace verification becomes mandatory under President Bush and David Dreier.

275 posted on 12/21/2004 5:43:03 AM PST by Fatalis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
That's a fair statement. I missed it before my previous comment to you.
276 posted on 12/21/2004 5:55:12 AM PST by Fatalis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Actually,you pay attention to "he said, she said" statements if you agree with them.

No I don't.

There may be an odd jury that convicts, but the general rule is that they acquit.

The general rule as I see it is the employers "cop a plea" and fines or payoffs are made. Very few juries see these cases.

OK, Here's the biggest fact: US Attorneys get bonuses (aka) "pro pay" or "proficiency pay", raises or bonuses based on their conviction rates.

High conviction rates equals lots of money rolling in.

The refusal of US Attorneys to spend time is quite telling in this context. A US Attorney would indict his own grandmother if he thought he would get a conviction. Conversely, they aren't going to spend time on cases that are likely to end in acquital.

It sounds to me like the US Attorneys have the same mentality as the federal airport workers. It looks like they all like to harass grandmothers instead of doing their job.

277 posted on 12/21/2004 6:17:38 AM PST by texastoo (a "has-been" Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Fatalis; Poohbah; All

Gotta go. Merry Christmas to all.


278 posted on 12/21/2004 6:25:52 AM PST by texastoo (a "has-been" Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
Yawn. Just another "Bush is a traitor because he won't kick all the Mexicans out of the U.S. . .

I think a lot of Freepers are not comprehending how difficult that would be, nor are they considering the dangers of keeping the status quo i.e. do nothing which is going to be the effective result of an insistance on a zero-tolerance policy.

279 posted on 12/21/2004 6:33:42 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Just be glad our immigrants are from a basically Christian country, and they don't come here with orders from God to kill us all.

A voice of reason.

280 posted on 12/21/2004 6:35:03 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 321-329 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson