To: blanknoone
I would question whether putting 4 shots in the kid was excessive. It may have been, it may not have been. If the kid kept coming, the officer certainly should have kept firing, but if the officer was at all careful in where he shot kid, the first three should have been sufficiently debilitating to eliminate the threat.If it is still standing it is a threat.
27 posted on
12/20/2004 8:41:43 AM PST by
cpdiii
(If you do not believe in entropy and enthalpy, look at government by liberals)
To: cpdiii
If it is still standing it is a threat.Yeah, but if he is still standing after three shots...the officer might need some training. Either in where to shoot, or how to hit what he is aiming at.
31 posted on
12/20/2004 8:49:13 AM PST by
blanknoone
(The two big battles left in the War on Terror are against our State dept and our media.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson