Skip to comments.
Soldier Says He Asked Rumsfeld 'Armor' Question Without Aid of Embed
Editor and Publisher ^
| 12/19/04
| E&P Staff
Posted on 12/20/2004 7:18:37 AM PST by Pikamax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
1
posted on
12/20/2004 7:18:38 AM PST
by
Pikamax
To: Pikamax
To: Pikamax
*sniff*
What's that smell? Vaguely bovine...
3
posted on
12/20/2004 7:20:03 AM PST
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: SoFloFreeper
So you support the troops until they ask to be properly supported? Sounds about right.
4
posted on
12/20/2004 7:20:35 AM PST
by
ragnark
To: Pikamax
Sounds as if he is trying to make amends so as not to delay his next promotion.
5
posted on
12/20/2004 7:21:18 AM PST
by
Piquaboy
(22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
To: Frank_Discussion
If it costs me my career to save another soldier, I'll give it."
Oh, puhleeeze... That's so, SO out of touch and weird to say. Give your life for another, yeah. Specifically hari-kari one's "carreer"? How utterly melodramatic. Ans as if that was under threat from the the SecDef, his staff, or his superiors.
I dare say continuing to open his big yap is going to be more damaging to his carreer...
6
posted on
12/20/2004 7:22:55 AM PST
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: Pikamax
Oh. So the imbed was lying? Not too surprising.
7
posted on
12/20/2004 7:23:16 AM PST
by
Brilliant
To: Pikamax
..."In other words, we completed all the armoring within 24 hours of the time the question was asked.''
8
posted on
12/20/2004 7:23:41 AM PST
by
Wolverine
(A Concerned Citizen)
To: Pikamax
So, did he get and pass the question from the journalist or not? One of them must be lying then...
9
posted on
12/20/2004 7:25:40 AM PST
by
paudio
(Four More Years..... Let's Use Them Wisely...)
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: ragnark
So you support the troops until they ask to be properly supported? Sounds about right.No, it doesn't sound right, but it does sound typical.
11
posted on
12/20/2004 7:27:07 AM PST
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: Pikamax
What a doofus.
A loser
and a liar
The wording of that question, the phrasing, the "lecture-while-asking" mood of the whole thing screams...
"I am press and I am clueless, but I am out to get you, na na na na!"
Give me a freakin' break!
12
posted on
12/20/2004 7:27:10 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
To: SoFloFreeper
These young soldiers have no idea of the faux "support" they are suddenly getting from Time and other left-wing media elites.
They will learn with maturity I quess, as we all have done.
To: Pikamax
So who's telling the truth here? One of them is a liar...or could it be both?
14
posted on
12/20/2004 7:28:05 AM PST
by
mass55th
("If I were two faced, would I be wearing this one?"----Abe Lincoln (1809-1865))
To: Pikamax
The Time account continues: As for Rumsfeld's brusque response that even a fully armored vehicle can be blown up--Wilson says, Personally, I didn't like that answer.brusque
brusque also brusk ( P ) Pronunciation Key (brsk) adj.
Abrupt and curt in manner or speech; discourteously blunt. See Synonyms at gruff.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [French, lively, fierce, from Italian brusco, coarse, rough, from Late Latin brscum, perhaps blend of Latin rscus, butcher's broom,, and Late Latin brcus, heather; see briar1.] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- brusquely adv.
brusqueness n.
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
brusque adj : marked by rude or peremptory shortness; "try to cultivate a less brusque manner"; "a curt reply"; "the salesgirl was very short with him" [syn: brusk, curt, short(p)] Source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University
~snip~
I fail to see how TIME can accurately characterize Rumsfeld's lengthy and thoughtful answer as "brusque". Unless they have an agenda, of course. Then I can see how they can mischaracterize it so.
To: mass55th
PRESS = AGENDA
SOLDIER = SAVING FACE (Embarrassed by buddies)
16
posted on
12/20/2004 7:32:57 AM PST
by
Wolverine
(A Concerned Citizen)
To: Pikamax
But he added, I hope I didn't do any damage to Secretary Rumsfeld. No, you jackass. You just gave the RATs, MSM and some idiot Republicans talking points that will last until Rummy gets disgusted and quits.
Yeah, jackass. Proud of yourself?
17
posted on
12/20/2004 7:33:53 AM PST
by
jackbill
To: Bush4eternity
wonder how many other units don't have armor yet thoughIf you really cared you'd know the answer has been given. Or perhaps you just want the question to hang out there as if it was shrugged off and ignored?
To: ragnark
"So you support the troops until they ask to be properly supported? Sounds about right."
Big Big BUMP.
19
posted on
12/20/2004 7:35:25 AM PST
by
jpsb
To: Bush4eternity
That information can be easily found through a Google search. Google and thee shall find. I think you'll be surprised.
Welcome to the FR and remember, the SHIFT key isn't there only for when you readjust yourself in your computer chair.
APf
20
posted on
12/20/2004 7:36:22 AM PST
by
APFel
(Humanity has a poor track record of predicting its own future.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson