[oceanview]

this doesn't mean much. we need to be running 527 ads against her, starting next year, to get those negative numbers up to near 50%. we need to run an early negative campaign against her, because as it stands now, it looks likely that our candidate is likely to be "unknown" by national political standards.

[HitmanLV]

She must be dealt with, but I don't think she is nearly as formidable as she has convinced herself she is. Frankly I don't even think she will get the nomination.

[Giant Conservative]

Any socially conservative Republican, provided they have a sufficient resume of experience governing, can beat Clinton in 2008.

On the other hand, any socially liberal Republican would unquestionably lose to Clinton in 2008.

So, which way will the Republican Party go?

[ohCompGk]

I don't really expect the Dem's to jump on Hillary's bandwagon despite what she would like. It's probably too soon to start on her until we see real signs from the Dems.