Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Yes, Dick Dahl and the anti's want out guns.
1 posted on 12/19/2004 6:14:48 PM PST by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Dan from Michigan

I sure hope they don't let the fact that this has failed every time it's been tried discourage them.


2 posted on 12/19/2004 6:16:58 PM PST by flashbunny (Every thought that enters my head requires its own vanity thread.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

"The hope is twofold, that officers will have an opportunity to interact with folks and, if they have a handgun, that will be reason enough to confiscate it," he said. "Second, we know that for even law-abiding folks who own guns, the rates of suicide and mortality are substantially higher. So while just perceived to be a crime thing, we think there is a wide benefit to limiting the number of guns in the city." -
Bill Barnes, aide to Chris Daly, San Francisco city stupervisor.
3 posted on 12/19/2004 6:17:11 PM PST by Citizen James (Well done is better than well said - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

You can bet the restrictions on Rights will result in more innocent deaths, just to appease those whom like to swim in the blood of innocent victims of the crime of disarmament.


4 posted on 12/19/2004 6:20:47 PM PST by herewego (based on a true story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Badray

PING

Typical libiots........


5 posted on 12/19/2004 6:21:48 PM PST by Conservative Goddess (Veritas vos Liberabit, in Vino, Veritas....QED, Vino vos Liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
AIDS has killed far more people in San Francisco than guns ever will, but no one there wants to ban homosexuality. As we know so well, it's not about safety, but about socialism.

It's a shame. San Francisco is such a lovely town, except for all the liberals.

6 posted on 12/19/2004 6:22:05 PM PST by Batrachian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

That exemption for "security personnel" would, of course, be most concerned with the bodyguards the rich leftists who are pushing this legislation hire.


8 posted on 12/19/2004 6:24:06 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

You can sure that the elites of San Francisco will still be allowed armed guards. And the criminals will always have guns since they don't follow any laws.


9 posted on 12/19/2004 6:24:08 PM PST by John Thornton ("Appeasers always hope that the crocodile will eat them last." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

I keep asking - "If these guys are really that upset about homicide, why don't they just ban murder?"


11 posted on 12/19/2004 6:34:31 PM PST by DuncanWaring (...and Freedom tastes of Reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

Next thing you know they will be banning drugs and then only outlaws will have drugs.


12 posted on 12/19/2004 6:36:43 PM PST by pennyfarmer (A whole lotta people need some killin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

"Juliet Leftwich, managing attorney at the Legal Community Against Violence (LCAV) in San Francisco"

What an appropriate name!


14 posted on 12/19/2004 6:50:31 PM PST by HalfAMind (A creative tagline is vanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

One of our Supervisors, Matt Gonzales, graffiti'd the walls in his City Hall office recently. Just so you what kind of morons we're dealing with.


17 posted on 12/19/2004 7:02:13 PM PST by my_pointy_head_is_sharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

actually this smacks of a set up for a test case to establish that the second amendment is not an individual right. I submit this is a trojan horse with an goal of establishing case law to reinvigorate gun control relegislation.


20 posted on 12/19/2004 7:09:16 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
i wonder if they will use the permit lists???

hello... we're form the government and we're here to help pick up your guns!!!

keep telling yourself it's just a dream, it's just a dream...

22 posted on 12/19/2004 7:20:48 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©® - Dubya... F**K YEAH!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

Residents will be able to get mugged and killed without having to put with a lot of noise. Danged noise polution, anyhow. Progress!! Progress, I say, Watson!


25 posted on 12/19/2004 8:32:29 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

Maybe we should encourage them to ban all weapons. That is, if it won't get through airport security, it's illegal. Then let's watch the fun.


26 posted on 12/19/2004 8:38:28 PM PST by freedom_forge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

Great idea. It's why New York and Washington D.C. are the safest cities in America.


27 posted on 12/19/2004 8:58:52 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

Gaaahh ... I would just grit my teeth and ignore this happy nonsense, except that I live only an hour from San Francisco, and where Big Mama Duck leads, our local city council baby ducks eventually want to follow. If they get this ban through in SF, I'm sure it will be a matter of time until it's proposed locally. (Not to mention in many other cities around the country!)

We don't even OWN a gun, except for one rifle that is a family heirloom. But I'm thinking it's time for me to join or make a contribution to the NRA. (My dad is a lifetime member -- he'll be happy to hear that I'm thinking about that! :)


29 posted on 12/19/2004 9:51:05 PM PST by Hetty_Fauxvert (http://sonoma-moderate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan
prohibit the ownership of handguns by everyone except law-enforcement officers, members of the military, or security personnel.

I wonder if this could be challenged as a violation of the U.S. Constitution. Even apart from the Second Amendment, it seems to me that a law allowing handguns only to certain people and not others violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

31 posted on 12/19/2004 10:08:39 PM PST by Dave Olson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dan from Michigan

Didn't feinstein pack a piece (I mean carry a rod, I mean carry a gun) when she was mayorette of Sodom, I mean San francisco?


32 posted on 12/19/2004 10:12:34 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson