> First, you said no knowledge is possible without experimentation
Let's jsut check on that:
You said: You think the only valid knowledge is what is produced by experimentation.
I replied: Anything else is unsubstantiated guesswork.
The position holds, and so far without valid counter by yourself.
> "it is bad to steal" and "I should keep my promises".
While *generally* good ideas, those are not "facts." A "fact" in the case of the former would be "If I were to steal, the consequences could be X."
> you're simply defining knowledge as you go, in a logical circle
Incorrect. Knowledge is simply "known fact."
This is a tautology!
This is all over your head. Regards.