Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: asgardshill
Bunk. Autosigning is not an indicator of insensitivity.

And no, if there were "autosigning" in other administrations...and I'm sure there WAS, there would not be an outrage by us long-time FREEPers (notice you've only been here 6 months).

For one thing, it wouldn't even be REPORTED that auto-signing was happening in a Clinton administration.

Rumsfeld has deftly handled two wars and the revitalization of a military that was decimated after eight years of a Sink Stainer cutting and slashing. He deserves to stay.

178 posted on 12/20/2004 2:41:47 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Recovering_Democrat
The amount of time I have been on FreeRepublic is irrelevant. Publicly noting somebody's signup date is the rhetorical and intellectual equivalent of saying "you're a doodyhead" in debate. (Actually, it takes a little more wit to actually enunciate the word "doodyhead" since it isn't in common usage any more). If you really think I am a newbie troll, then go whine to the mods and get me banned from the site. I'm waiting.

For one thing, it wouldn't even be REPORTED that auto-signing was happening in a Clinton administration.

I really don't care what they did in the Clinton administration. That is history, and dark history at that. But Donald Rumsfeld is supposed to be a better man than Les Aspin or the other tomato cans that Clinton appointed to the post.

Rumsfeld has deftly handled two wars and the revitalization of a military that was decimated after eight years of a Sink Stainer cutting and slashing. He deserves to stay.

I said in a single sentence in a single post that Donald Rumsfeld "should go", a statement I have since retracted. However, there is nothing that will prevent me from commenting negatively on the basic cheapness and tackiness of sending a "Dear (fill in the blank)" form letter to families who have lost loved ones. And if you can't see how such a letter could be interpreted as insulting and degrading by a recipient who just lost a part of their heart's blood, then we have nothing further to discuss.

179 posted on 12/20/2004 2:54:24 AM PST by asgardshill (Cost of the ink in a signature: .016 cent. A fallen American soldier's life: Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson