What do you think you mean by this? What is your definition of randomness? Why do you think that randomenss isn't subject to its own rules?
What do you think you mean by this? What is your definition of randomness? Why do you think that randomenss isn't subject to its own rules?
But I do think that randomness can be subject to its own rules. When I said 'Randomness constrained by rules is not entirely random' I am referring to random in the sense that implies "that no matter what the cause of something, its nature is not only unknown but the consequences of its operation are also unknown." (from Wikopedia). This sense would tend to discredit the idea of a "random designer". However, randomness within a framework of rules is still random but doesn't invalidate the idea of a "random designer".