[BJungNan]

It's a science class, not comparative religion.

You make my point. It is all religion. And again I say and noone replies, if you are going to teach one, then teach them all. Why the exclusion in favor of the exclusive presentation of evolution?

Still waiting for the reply...tap...tap...tap...

[VadeRetro]

You make my point. It is all religion. And again I say and noone replies, if you are going to teach one, then teach them all. Why the exclusion in favor of the exclusive presentation of evolution?

Because it's SCIENCE class and all the evidence there is (comparative anatomy, genetics, paleontology, embryology, 29+ independent lines in all) points to evolution.

Still waiting for the reply...tap...tap...tap...

How exactly does one teach "You can't make me see"-ism, anyway? What does one learn by being immune to information?

[Doctor Stochastic]

And again I say and noone replies, if you are going to teach one, then teach them all.

Then you really do support teaching that the Hopi and Moslem and Celtic versions of Creation are equally valid to that of the Jews and Babylonians?

[stremba]

If they are both religions, then I am waiting for a fundamentalist pastor to start presenting evolution from the pulpit on Sunday morning. When that happens, then I will be okay with creationism in a science class.