[general_re]

I see, so what you'd like is for us to accept the existence of a new sort of logical fallacy, the fallacy of citing authorities Wallace disagrees with.

I do not think this is likely to gain much traction among the logicians and philosophers of the world, but let me know how it works out.

[Wallace T.]

Are you going to support stare decisis just because most mainstream Constitutional scholars adhere to the doctrine? If so, you would be a pariah among many political conservatives and most libertarians.