Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry

I have never observed as mich rigor given to verifying the exponential formulas used to justify any ancient dating of material as I have observed 'evolutionists' devote themselves to creating evolutionary trails.

The dating method is simply a convenient method of ignoring the weaknesses inherant in 'evolution' by asserting something is billions or trillions of years old.

This lack of concern by evolutionary theorists doesn't give me any good grounds to find their premises override Scripture.

On the contrary, the lackidasical method implied by appealing to a very broadly expressed exponential,..and then emphatically holding on to figures of billions and trillions, merely manifests how ignorant arrogance matures despite the amount of academic study any soul devotes themselves to absorbing information.

I state this not as supporting 'creationism', but as one who simply assumed 'evolution' as being accepted fact. The more I have studied the issue, the less I've found 'evolutionary' proponents to render a 'scientific' viewpoint in favor of simple arrogance and opposition to anything or any idea which might be holy.


246 posted on 12/20/2004 4:16:12 AM PST by Cvengr (;^))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cvengr
I have never observed as mich rigor given to verifying the exponential formulas...

Try here.

281 posted on 12/20/2004 6:32:58 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson