Posted on 12/17/2004 8:41:38 PM PST by TexasGreg
Briton freed from Guantanamo prison tells European rights body of U.S. abuse 11:27 PM EST Dec 17
PARIS (AP) - A Briton released from the U.S. prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, told Europe's top human rights body Friday he was beaten, shackled, kept in a cramped cage and fed rotten food as part of "systematic abuse" in custody.
Jamal al-Harith's testimony before a Council of Europe panel came as part of an inquiry by the body into human rights abuses at the U.S. prison camp to be made public in a report due out early next year.
Reading from a 10-page statement, al-Harith described his two-year detention at Guantanamo Bay as a period of continual mistreatment that ranged from humiliation and 15-hour interrogations to physical abuse he said left scars.
At one point, al-Harith said he refused to take an unidentified injection and was chained up and attacked by five men wearing helmets, body armour and shields.
"They jumped on my legs and back and they kicked and punched me," said the 37-year-old website designer and father of three from Manchester, England.
"Then I was put in isolation for a month."
Al-Harith said he was kept mostly in a wire cage and given food marked "10 to 12 years beyond their usable date," as well as "black and rotten" fruit. Sometimes, unmuzzled dogs were brought to the cage and encouraged to bark, he said.
Detained in Afghanistan in October 2001, al-Harith maintains he had travelled to the region to attend a religious retreat in Pakistan.
He and three other Britons were released in March and have filed a lawsuit in a U.S. court seeking $10 million each in damages. Never charged, they maintain they were innocents caught up in the U.S. war on terrorism. They were denied access to lawyers, as are most prisoners in Guantanamo.
When al-Harith and the others filed their lawsuits in October, the Pentagon denied the abuse allegations and said the men were properly held in Guantanamo after being captured in Afghanistan and having fought for al-Qaida.
"The U.S. policy is to treat all detainees and to conduct interrogations, wherever they may occur, is in a manner consistent with all U.S. legal obligations," Maj. Michael Shavers, a Pentagon spokesman, said at the time.
Robert Lizar, al-Harith's lawyer, urged the panel to use strong language in its report and to condemn U.S. behaviour at Guantanamo that he called "totally shocking and unacceptable from international norms."
"The actions are closer to those of kidnappers and bandits, than to those of a state with a strong tradition of liberty and due process," Lizar said.
Al-Harith said during long interrogations, he was given no choice but to urinate on the floor and repeatedly threatened or asked to confess to crimes he had not committed in exchange for a payoff.
Interrogators threatened to seize his family's home, unless he admitted to having gone to Pakistan to buy drugs or to become involved with terrorism, al-Harith said.
"On another occasion, the interrogators promised me money, a car, a house, a job if I admitted those things," he said.
"I refused."
During questioning, al-Harith said he was placed in shackles that prevented him from standing upright and cut into his flesh, leaving scars on his wrists and ankles.
Similar abuses are detailed in a memo obtained exclusively by The Associated Press this month that suggests the U.S. Defence Department has done nothing about FBI complaints of "highly aggressive" interrogations reported as early as 2002. The memo quotes a U.S. marine telling an FBI observer some interrogations led to prisoners "curling into a fetal position on the floor and crying in pain."
Kevin McNamara, who presided over Friday's hearing for the council, said the global fight against terrorism should not be used as an excuse to violate basic human rights, the right to a fair trial and the rule of law.
"Hundreds of what must be presumed to be innocent people remain in indeterminate detention in Guantanamo Bay," he said.
"By all accounts, the abuse continues."
McNamara said the council plans to publish its report on the subject in the early months of 2005.
© The Canadian Press, 2004
I think that one of the prerequisites for becoming a Muslim, is one has to first become a pathological liar.
Lately, I find myself wondering how Harry Truman would be fighting this war.
Or even FDR for that matter.
Lessee ... we're supposed to believe this piece of Muslim scum? I'll believe him after a liberal gives me the name of 20 prominent Arabs or Muslims that can prove they don't lie as a matter of personal or public policy. When that happens, maybe I'll believe this POS.
BTW, the Brits might have been stupid enough to give him a passport but he is not a Briton. He is a Muslim POS.
that does sound more plausible.
In 1981...
...and given food marked "10 to 12 years beyond their usable date," ....
Yea, yea. I shop at 7-11 too.
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.
Me too.
If the American left of today was alive and active in 1941 would we still have gone to war with Japan, or would the left ask "What did America do to provoke the Japanese?
As far as dropping the bomb goes, Truman would be a war criminal and tried in the Hague.
Whatever happened to Baghdad Bob???
If he weren't already dead, they'd have tried it already.
He moved to France and lives next to Chiraq ?
I believe it...ROFLMAO
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.