Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. soldier accused of killing wounded Iraqi to be court-martialled [PETITION]
CBC News ^ | 09:03 PM EST Dec 17 | DAVID RISING

Posted on 12/17/2004 6:11:11 PM PST by Critical Bill

BERLIN (AP) - A U.S. tank company commander accused of killing a critically injured Iraqi man who chauffeured radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr will be court-martialled, an army spokesman said Tuesday.

Capt. Rogelio Maynulet, 29, of Chicago will be tried on charges of assault with intent to commit murder and dereliction of duty, which carry a maximum combined sentence of 20½ years, said Maj. Michael Indovina.

During Maynulet's military hearing - the equivalent of a civilian grand jury investigation - witnesses testified that the driver had been shot in the head when Maynulet saw him. A fellow officer said Maynulet told him he then shot the man out of compassion.

Maynulet was initially charged with murder, but 1st Armoured Division commander Maj.-Gen. Martin Dempsey decided Monday to proceed with lesser charges at his court-martial. The army would not say whether Dempsey was acting on the hearing officer's recommendation or opted for lesser charges himself.

Maynulet's defence attorney, Capt. Will Helixon, could not be reached for comment.

Former commanders of Maynulet spoke highly of him during his hearing, saying he was a trustworthy officer and a particularly good combat commander.

Prosecutors tried to paint a different picture, however, citing other incidents in which they maintained Maynulet broke military rules.

They said he had carried a non-regulation weapon and once broke into an Iraqi police station to retrieve an identification card for a civilian contractor.

The court-martial charges stem from a May 21 incident in which Maynulet was leading his tank company on a patrol near Kufa, where heavy fighting had been reported.

(Excerpt) Read more at cbc.ca ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: courtmartial; crime; maynulet; petition; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Around 600 have signed the petition online for this soldier, please help and sign also: petitiononline
1 posted on 12/17/2004 6:11:11 PM PST by Critical Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Critical Bill

Any military people out there.....will he be acquitted of this "crime"?


2 posted on 12/17/2004 6:19:15 PM PST by cfrels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Critical Bill
Sorry, can't sign it. The part about the soldiers unit being the adjudicator of a court martial runs contrary to the functions of a chain of command.
3 posted on 12/17/2004 6:22:20 PM PST by crazyhorse691 (We won. We don't need to be forgiving. Let the heads roll!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Critical Bill

You get your login from "Things to do in Denver when you're dead"?


4 posted on 12/17/2004 6:25:21 PM PST by CriticalJ (Ecc 10:2 A wise man's heart is at his right hand; but a fool's heart at his left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

concur


5 posted on 12/17/2004 6:26:43 PM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Critical Bill

How the hell can we win a war if this kind of thing goes on?


6 posted on 12/17/2004 6:31:15 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691
Chain of Command still retains the responsibility of providing a full review all the way up to the appropriate level.

As to whether he'll be acquited or not will depend on the make-up of the courts presiding officers. Combat veterans? REMFs? Who knows. Still, having watched a WIA die over a period of hours with a similar wound, I'd personally opt for the quick way. Not a great way to go.

7 posted on 12/17/2004 6:31:26 PM PST by Adrastus (I am locked and loaded with a clear field of fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Adrastus

AMEN BROTHER!!!


8 posted on 12/17/2004 6:33:13 PM PST by snowman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Critical Bill

Wasn't the victim also pinned in a burning vehicle? Or was that another case?


9 posted on 12/17/2004 6:35:56 PM PST by TXnMA (Attention, ACLU: There is no constitutionally protected right to NOT be offended -- Shove It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Critical Bill
This is war. These things happen, and this soldier was doing his duty. He should never be court martialled for this.
10 posted on 12/17/2004 6:36:10 PM PST by Swede Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Critical Bill
They said he had carried a non-regulation weapon

Hopefully something far more effective and reliable than that *&$#% Beretta...

11 posted on 12/17/2004 6:44:03 PM PST by TXnMA (Attention, ACLU: There is no constitutionally protected right to NOT be offended -- Shove It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Critical Bill
They said he had carried a non-regulation weapon

Hopefully something far more effective and reliable than that *&$#% Beretta...

12 posted on 12/17/2004 6:46:04 PM PST by TXnMA (Attention, ACLU: There is no constitutionally protected right to NOT be offended -- Shove It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swede Girl

Those supporting the soldier(s) need to start calling and writing (emailing) the White House (202) 456-1111(President@whitehouse.gov) and the Department of the Defense ASAP. The more the better! In my opinion, calling in your comments to the White House does more than online petitions. And, while you're at it, call the RNC in Washington (202)863-8545.


13 posted on 12/17/2004 6:47:03 PM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Adrastus
As to whether he'll be acquited or not will depend on the make-up of the courts presiding officers. Combat veterans? REMFs? Who knows. Still, having watched a WIA die over a period of hours with a similar wound, I'd personally opt for the quick way. Not a great way to go.

Rule #1-don't get caught-never had to contend with drones. He got caught doing a no no under the Geneva Conventions. And I have never been a stickler on their requirements.
14 posted on 12/17/2004 6:48:02 PM PST by crazyhorse691 (We won. We don't need to be forgiving. Let the heads roll!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cfrels

I hope not. He is wrong and violated the laws of war. There is no such thing as a mercy killing, it is nothing more than Hollywood bunk. Flame me all you want, that is just one military persons opinion.


15 posted on 12/17/2004 6:49:13 PM PST by RedlegCPT (Artillery lends dignity to what would otherwise be a vulgar brawl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CriticalJ
"You get your login from "Things to do in Denver when you're dead"?"

Yes I did. That and the fact that at 50 I find myself more cynical than is probably good for me.

16 posted on 12/17/2004 6:51:56 PM PST by Critical Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691
"Sorry, can't sign it. The part about the soldiers unit being the adjudicator of a court martial runs contrary to the functions of a chain of command."

Fair enough.

17 posted on 12/17/2004 6:52:35 PM PST by Critical Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: crazyhorse691

" He got caught doing a no no under the Geneva Conventions"

That only holds when fighting against a country/government.

The Geneve Conventions don't mean crap in this instance.

They ought to over there killing anything that moves.


18 posted on 12/17/2004 6:54:28 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Critical Bill

Done, and I have emailed several people with the link and asked them to sign forward as well.


19 posted on 12/17/2004 6:56:15 PM PST by diamond6 (Everyone who is for abortion has already been born. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Critical Bill

I did not see the actual Articles that he is charged with ... I just finished reading Articles 118 and I think he can beat that Article and Dereliction of Duty. His career is gone so I hope he not found guilty ....


20 posted on 12/17/2004 7:00:02 PM PST by Yasotay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson