Palestinian Genes Show Arab, Jewish, European and Black-African Ancestry

You are probably right with respect to Ireland but it is hard to say to what extent this was the case. I was just yelping about assumptions as people in science are prone to do.

I am convinced my mother is part Pict as with her family, they are from the highlands in Scotland originally. They are very white skinned and have dark hair, plus they have interesting dispositions to say the least. It is not politically correct to say but the highlanders were certainly used for centuries by the English and probably are somewhat unique in character. Even in Iraq the US asks for a battalion for support in the triangle and who do the English send?

Anyway, the Picts were an odd bunch, they were very different from other Europeans, including the supposed original Celts. This makes it hard to place them in the scheme of things. They can be identified by round houses. Rome built 2 walls, one of the walls Hadrian's wall was manned by 3 legions and was about 20 feet high. Then, if I remember correctly there was another three legions in fortifications behind it.

The Romans went up to what is now Scotland and 'won' battles, then left the area immediately. They also admitted to loosing 50,000 men in a battle (this is disputed by Romanophiles but why would they lie about their losses?) they lost to the Picts. When the Romans left England in 408(If I remember correctly), the Picts were sacking London as they did so.

Most historians have a serious 'excited disposition' when it comes to the Romans and they dismiss the Picts as just raiders but there were many raiders on the empires borders, and not many walls as heavily defended as Hadrian's. The historians do this to the Germanic tribes too, saying they just fought in forests but dismiss battles like Adrianople which were open and massive.

The Picts were probably pretty crazy and very different. So the question is, who the heck were they? Earlier settlers that were preserved in Scotland or Celts that were changed by the land? They are no longer any pure Picts so its a bit of a problem. They were bred out of existence and their culture destroyed upon their conversion. The Picts were not appreciably settled by the Vikings or Romans (despite the fact that Historians say they lost many battles to them) so they did not go out with a bang but a whimper. This does not seem fair to a people with their history of defiance.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.