Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic; robertpaulsen
The Shriveport Rate Cases.


Congress ... does possess the power to foster and protect interstate commerce, and to take all measures necessary or appropriate to that end, although intrastate transactions of interstate carriers may be thereby controlled."

Houston, East & West Texas Railway v. United States, 234 U.S. 342 (1914)

86 posted on 12/17/2004 12:43:02 PM PST by VaBarrister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: VaBarrister
The Shreveport Rate Cases.

The Shreveport case involved regulation of intrastate commerce indirectly because it was done by a registered carrier of interstate commerce. The decision states "by reason of their control of the carriers". What was being regulated was the carrier, as an instrument of interstate commerce. By robertpaulsen's logic, it was necessary and proper for Congress to declare each and every one of us an "instrument of interstate commerce" for the purpose of regulation under the Commerce Clause.

92 posted on 12/17/2004 12:49:34 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson