One poster did .... wait, that was you, don't you remember? You said, "the ratio could change because of relatively increased use in the lower 48."
Now, weasel out of it by reming us that you said "could" change and "relatively" increased use.
Why do I friggin' bother?
Oh, and keep showing up on these drug threads, MrLeRoy. The more people who know how a banned poster (a banned Soros troll is more descriptive) actually conducts himself, the better.
One poster did .... wait, that was you, don't you remember? You said, "the ratio could change because of relatively increased use in the lower 48."
Now, weasel out of it by reming us that you said "could" change
The only weaseling here is yours; to say "could" is explicitly not to "posit." How long will you attempt to defend your latest dishonesty before you slink away?