Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
The original intent of the Commerce Clause is irrelevant. It is irrelevant because it is not the sole intent of the Commerce Clause.

That makes no sense whatsoever. The original intent is the intent of those who wrote it and ratified it. That is synonymous with "sole intent". Only those who write and ratify a document can impart to it intent of any description.

304 posted on 12/19/2004 2:20:31 PM PST by inquest (Now is the time to remove the leftist influence from the GOP. "Unity" can wait.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
"That is synonymous with "sole intent"."

Madison found another constitutional use for the Commerce Clause, now didn't he?

So much for your sole intent. So much for your original intent. They were made irrelevant by Madison.

311 posted on 12/19/2004 2:47:58 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson