Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
When Madison used the phrase, "for the positive purposes of the General Government", he was referring to the federal government using the power of the Commerce Clause (a tariff on foreign imports) for the positive purpose (benefit) of local manufactures.

He said it was not intended "for the positive purposes of the General Government", when applied to the regulation of commerce among the several states.

292 posted on 12/19/2004 12:37:20 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
Well, let's see if I can summarize.

Congress can regulate commerce with foreign Nations for the positive purposes of the General Government, is that correct?

But you're saying that Congress cannot regulate commerce among the several states for the positive purposes of the General Government, is that correct? Can you tell me why not?

295 posted on 12/19/2004 12:51:22 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson