Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen

The Commerce Clause cannot simultanously be used for the positive purposes of the nation and not be used for the positive purposes of the national government if the two are interchangeable. Your conslusions are contradictory based on your source.


278 posted on 12/19/2004 11:28:56 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
When Madison used the phrase, "for the positive purposes of the General Government", he was referring to the federal government using the power of the Commerce Clause (a tariff on foreign imports) for the positive purpose (benefit) of local manufactures.

He didn't say for the positive benefit of the General Government.

281 posted on 12/19/2004 11:47:09 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson