Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
The arguments are mainly against "smoked" marijuana for medical purposes.

If it works, is controlled and prescribed by a doctor, it wouldn't matter to me if they smoke it, inject it or by what means it eventually reaches the blood stream.

I find it an illogical premise that this whole desire for medical use of marijuana is just a way to open the gates for a bunch of dope smokers.

21 posted on 12/17/2004 10:46:20 AM PST by evad (DUmmie FUnnies and Pookie Toons-the start of a nice day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: evad
I find it an illogical premise that this whole desire for medical use of marijuana is just a way to open the gates for a bunch of dope smokers.

Perhaps you should do your homework and read up on Soros and his quest for total drug legalization and how he is using the medical marijuana scam as the "camel's nose under the tent" toward total drug legalization.

40 posted on 12/17/2004 11:12:31 AM PST by WildTurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: evad
"If it works, is controlled and prescribed by a doctor,"

Moot point. The product is neither controlled or prescribed by a doctor.

If marijuana were teated the same as any other drug in the medical community, I would have no problem supporting it. The medical marijuana legalizers want an exception made for their "medicine".

That, I don't support.

41 posted on 12/17/2004 11:12:58 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson