Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen

"A simple congressional majority could adopt a statute [to ban alcohol]"

Says who?


196 posted on 12/18/2004 1:12:34 PM PST by Know your rights (The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: Know your rights
You read the link.

Are you saying that a simple congressional majority could not adopt a statute to ban alcohol? Where's your proof?

I don't recall an amendment for The Lever Food and Fuel Control Act of August 1917 which banned the production of distilled spirits for the duration of the war.

After the war was over, I don't recall an amendment for The War Prohibition Act of November 1918 which forbade the manufacture and sale of all intoxicating beverages of more than 2.75 percent alcohol content, beer and wine as well as hard liquor, until demobilization was completed.

A whole bunch of statutes passed by Congress.

Geez, there was passage early in 1913 of the Webb-Kenyon Act, a long-sought federal statute against transporting liquor into states that wished to block its entry.

207 posted on 12/18/2004 1:44:05 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson