To: conserv13
"Why doesn't the federal government just decriminalize marijuana possesion (importing it or transporting across state lines could still be illegal)?"First, I think you mean "legalize" not "decriminalize". Decriminalization means that marijuana is still illegal, but the offense is reduced to a civil misdemeanor with usually a small fine. Some states have decriminalized.
You're looking to turn the legalization decision over to the states and leaving the federal government out of it (unless, as you say, it crosses our borders or state lines).
The 21st amendment, Section 2, did exactly that for alcohol. I would suggest that we get a similar amendment for drugs if we want to go down that path.
To: robertpaulsen
The 21st amendment reversed the 18th amendment. What amendment would your suggested amendment be repealing?
Seriously, are you suggesting that we pass an amendment removing a power of the (federal) govt. when that power isn't even enumerated in the first place? Have you any idea how dangerous of a precedent that would be?
26 posted on
12/17/2004 10:57:58 AM PST by
Durus
To: robertpaulsen
The 21st amendment, Section 2, did exactly that for alcohol. I would suggest that we get a similar amendment for drugs if we want to go down that path.This is true, because , as you stated, some states have already decriminalized it. IMO, prohibition on MJ doesn't work , in the same way that it did not work for alcohol.
132 posted on
12/17/2004 5:32:23 PM PST by
Jackknife
(.......Land of the Free,because of the Brave.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson