Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spyder

"it's just a weed, for pete's sake. If you couldn't ban alcohol, how do you expect to keep people from growing it?"

"Weed" is an ignorant dysphemism! as are "pot" and "dope."
Some seem to believe that an herb given by God to man and beast alike at the beginning of time and which has grown freely almost everywhere,
including here long before our nation was formed, is permissibly eradicable or controllable by the federal government through powers granted by the
interstate commerce clause of the Constitution. Though, it is an impossible task to devise a logical explanation of how this could be true. In light of
the rest of the Constitution any such perceived mandate dissolves.



"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their
Creator with inherent and inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness."

Preamble: ...secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity...

Amendment V: nor shall (anyone) be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment IX: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or
disparage others retained by the PEOPLE.



Amendment X: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to
the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the PEOPLE.



Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof


Nowhere in the Constitution is it enumerated what one may put into ones body. Therefore, that right is reserved for the states or the people. However,
since God has already specified in the Bible what one may consume, it is, in fact, the People’s God given right.


172 posted on 12/18/2004 10:58:02 AM PST by PaxMacian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]


To: Spyder; PaxMacian
Spyder, all this from a person who believes that God's children should suffer -- that they should not benefit from "an herb gifted by God".

Oh ... oh, the heartlessness. The inhumanity.

174 posted on 12/18/2004 11:05:57 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

To: PaxMacian

I think I agree, but I'm not entirely sure what you're saying. If you mean to say that it's nobody's business what you ingest if you're not endangering others I agree.


224 posted on 12/18/2004 4:24:06 PM PST by Spyder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson