To: Publius
Ok, let me get this straight. These ballots were rejected because the signatures were not scanned into a computer. But then we see that one of the signatures not scanned into a King County computer was a democratic councilman in a democratic county by more than likely democratic workers?
How can a democratic councilman's signature not be scanned into a computer by democratic workers in a democratic county? This seems very "odd" to say the least.
51 posted on
12/16/2004 12:24:57 PM PST by
MissouriConservative
(A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul)
To: MissouriConservative
"How can a democratic councilman's signature not be scanned into a computer by democratic workers in a democratic county? This seems very "odd" to say the least."
How could the butterfly ballots in so many Democratic counties of various states have been designed so poorly?
How could democratic poll workers neglect to maintain the polling equipment in so many democratic counties?
Apparently when talking about democratic elections officials, it's not wise to underestimate their incompetence.
There is likely evidence to show if these ballots were rejected for invalid reasons. It also sounds like the Republicans are going to make very sure this is investigated carefully before any ballots are added to the count.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson