Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KJacob

As a social obligation we believe should be enforced, dead-beat fathers are relevant. The more general point is that we think some obligations are so important that we do not let people opt out of them. Raising kids is one. I start there because I think we agree on that one. The question gets trickier when we ask what obligation we have to other peoples kids. And that gets us squarely to the matter of taxing some people for public schools for other people's kids. There are people who object to that. There are people who object to paying taxes for parks they do not go to. So, I think the real question for us is "do we have a clear notion of social obligation that will give us guidance for when we think nonperformance a serious enough matter to enforce performance?" I'm of a view that none of our institutions would last long if we didn't believe some obligations enforceable. Do you disagree?


8 posted on 12/16/2004 8:57:55 AM PST by rogerv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: rogerv
I'm of a view that none of our institutions would last long if we didn't believe some obligations enforceable.

I need a better understand of what you consider "obligations". So far you have only mentioned parenting. Give me a list of what you feel people should be obligated to do and I will answer.

10 posted on 12/16/2004 9:01:31 AM PST by KJacob (I will not worry about 2008 until late 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson