The problem here is that if anyone takes the time (say a half an hour) to read up on Kinsey (not articles by his followers but by those who have done research on him and his methods) will come to the inescapable conclusion that Kinsey is a fraudulent "scientist", a pervert, and a criminal by knowingly aiding and abetting crimes against children.
I haven't been to this thread since yesterday, but I put up a link for Bluegrass C. to read what Dr. Judith Reisman, who has written two books about Kinsey, has to say about him. If anyone wants to know the truth about him, the truth is there for all the world to see. If someone still thinks Kinsey was anything other than a digusting criminal, or doesn't want to inform themselves, words can't say what kind of mentality they have.
Link to Reisman's site:
http://www.drjudithreisman.org/
Should have pung you to the above.
Why not get back to the thread since you've had plenty of time to read what Dr. Reisman has to say about Kinsey and his methodology? What's your take on Kinsey?
Since you were remaining very neutral (kind of) but now you've had the opportunity to get education, let me and anyone else reading this thread know what your conclusion is. I'd really be interested to see where you stand on Kinsey's pedophile-derived "research".
Maybe Calpernia would like to know too.