Please address 109, which was to you. I guess you missed it.
Do you think I am lying about the thrust of my point at 109?
I do not support the police arresting people merely for setting up a table with Biblical literature, and I do not accept the notion that the mere expression of Christian opinions constitutes a "provocation." If that was what happened in Philadelphia, then I totally support the protestors as a matter of law, even if I think their method of evangelism is misguided. But some of us were just trying to verify what actually happened there, and whether there was anything in the protestors behavior which might have made some sense of the charges.